Ron Paul Gets Different Treatment From Sean Hannity After Debates

I did not get a chance to watch the debates
last night on Fox News but did get to watch
most of the aftermath. I just got to
see the highlights and Hannity and Colmes
interviewing each of the candidates.

As most of you know by now, I enjoy Fox News.
The one exception is Sean Hannity. He has
steadily become less and less of an interesting
political analyst and far more of a political
hack.

This was quite apparent to me with Ron Paul's
interview where Hannity takes a much more
negative and overbearing approach than he does
with any of the other candidates. That constant
interrupting is annoying. Ron Paul isn't a
candidate that typically gives canned answers or
goes on pre-canned diatribes. So, there was
no need to try and control the interview.

Hannity is in danger of becoming the exact thing
he rails on the lib pundits for being...He is
trying to control the story rather than just
report on it.

Ron Paul Conspiracy With Hillary Clinton

Ron Paul's fundraising got a major boost
recently with a $5 million dollar tally.

Is Ron Paul a poor impersonator of Ross Perot?

The dots are starting to connect...

In '92, Bill Clinton won with 43% of the popular
vote largely because of Ross Perot's 19% as a third
party candidate.

Is it possible that the Clinton minions are fueling
the Ron Paul rise to stardom in an attempt to repeat
history?

Are all these nasty posts from Ron Paul supports really
just libs hiding behind their computer monitors?

Will Ron Paul attempt an independent run when he fails
to get the GOP nomination?

This all seems a little too neat to me...

This conspiracy theory is, of course, just as
silly as the ones the Ron Paul supporters and
libs put up about Cheney and W. Just felt it
might be fun to give it a try myself.

Ya know what I find fascinating?

If some other candidate who didn't look
so angry all the time, supported our war
on terror, and then said and supported most
everything else than Ron Paul says or supports,
they'd call him another Reagan. Without an
anti-war on terror policy, this guy could
get the nomination.

Very interesting. I wonder if any of
the other candidates are listening?

Military Shafts National Guard

http://www.wcsh6.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=71741

If the jist of the following story is true, W needs to fix
the B.S. now. This is politically (and morally imho) stupid.
I highly doubt that this was a top down purposeful tactic used
to save money. No matter who or what drove this, W needs
to tac another day on these folk's deployment and give them
what they have coming. From the original story:

1st Lt. Jon Anderson said he never expected to come home to this:
A government refusing to pay education benefits he says he should
have earned under the GI bill.

"It's pretty much a slap in the face," Anderson said. "I think it
was a scheme to save money, personally. I think it was a leadership
failure by the senior Washington leadership... once again
failing the soldiers."

Anderson's orders, and the orders of 1,161 other Minnesota
guard members, were written for 729 days.

Had they been written for 730 days, just one day more,
the soldiers would receive those benefits to pay for school.

"Which would be allowing the soldiers an extra $500
to $800 a month," Anderson said.